
Stocks vs. Real Estate: The False Binary, Part 2 — Read This Before You Fall in Love With Any Strategy
“Because the fastest way to lose money—or conviction—is stepping into something you don’t fully understand.”
Inside this series, you’ll find proven, real-world strategies—spanning real estate, owner financing, covered call ETFs, and layered passive income—all designed to help you unlock lasting freedom.
In addition to the strengths, how the assets compliment each other, and are well structured in my Freedom Portfolio™, I’m also going to show you where things can go wrong.
Not to scare you. But to prepare you.
If we can identify the friction points upfront, we can build around them.
That’s the difference between something that sounds good in theory… and something that still works 10 years from now.
This is Part 2 of a 3-part series covering:
Part 1: The Strengths
Part 2: The Weaknesses
Part 3: How I Use Both (and Why)
[Adapted from Chapter 8 of Built for Freedom™]
Chapter 8 – Stocks vs. Real Estate: Why I Use Both
Control vs. Liquidity, Cash Flow vs. Flexibility — Understanding the Role Each Asset Plays in Your Freedom Portfolio™
Weaknesses of Each (Honest Evaluation)
Every asset class comes with trade-offs. Real estate isn’t all cash flow and appreciation — and stocks aren’t all passive simplicity. The key to intelligent portfolio design is understanding where each breaks down, so you can compensate with diversification, structure, and strategy.
Here’s an honest look at the cons of both.
Real Estate – Weaknesses
1. Operational Complexity
Even with property management, real estate has moving parts:
- Leases, turnovers, repairs.
- Unexpected maintenance.
- Tenant communication and local regulations.
Without systems, real estate can quickly turn into a second job.
2. Illiquidity
When I was new to real estate, I used to think:
“I’ve bought so low and have so much equity, if I’m ever in a real pinch, I can just drop the price enough to move it quickly — and still profit.”
Technically, that’s true. But here’s what I’ve learned:
When the market really turns, you won’t want to.
You may be sitting on $100,000 in equity — but when comps are crashing, buyers vanish, and fear is in the air, dumping a property for a massive discount becomes emotionally and strategically painful. Especially if that same property was “worth” six figures more just 12 months ago.
In those moments, the theoretical liquidity disappears. Real estate is illiquid — not just in mechanics, but in mindset.
3. Local Market Risk
Unlike a diversified ETF, a single property is tied to one street, one economy, one set of local dynamics. A poorly chosen location — or a declining neighborhood — can quietly erode both value and income.
4. Higher Entry Barrier
It typically takes significant capital, credit, and knowledge to acquire income-producing real estate. While leverage can multiply returns, it also amplifies risk if not used wisely.
5. Emotion + Burnout
If you self-manage — or even if you over-leverage — real estate can wear you down.
I’ve been there. I once personally managed 16–17 rentals and owner-financed notes. It nearly drove me to sell everything and walk away. The solution wasn’t quitting — it was building systems and treating real estate like a business, not a hustle.
(The Moment I Almost Quit Real Estate. See Chapter 6 for the full story of how burnout nearly ended my real estate career — and the shift that saved it.)
6. Inflation Risk (Notes Only)
In the case of owner-financed notes or fixed-rent leases, inflation can quietly erode purchasing power over time.
Your cash flow may stay flat… while your expenses climb.
Stocks and ETFs – Weaknesses
1. Volatility (and the Illusion of Diversification)
Most people believe they’re diversified if they own the S&P 500 — no single-company exposure, broad sector representation, and hundreds of stocks. And on paper, that’s true.
But here’s what I can tell you from experience:
When the market plunges, all of that goes out the window.
If 490 of your 500 stocks crash on the same day, is that really diversification?
In moments of fear, correlation goes to one — meaning almost everything drops together. It’s not just volatility — it’s synchronized panic. And unless you’ve lived through one of those cycles, it’s easy to overestimate your emotional tolerance.
Real estate might have its own risks, but it doesn’t usually drop 20% in a week while you sleep.
2. Less Control
You don’t control company decisions, dividend payouts, or market sentiment.
You’re a passenger — not the pilot. That can be unsettling for hands-on investors used to steering the wheel.
3. Taxable Distributions
Outside of retirement accounts, many income-focused ETFs generate ordinary income — which may be taxed at your highest marginal rate.
This is why tax location matters.
4. Yield Trade-Offs
Many dividend-focused investments pay just 2–4% annually. That may not be enough to meet your income goals unless paired with higher-yielding strategies like covered call ETFs — or supplemented with real estate.
5. Sequence of Returns Risk
For retirees drawing income from growth-oriented stock portfolios, a poorly timed downturn early in retirement can have outsized long-term effects.
This is one reason why many shift to cash flow-first assets later in life — including rentals, REITs, or yield-focused ETFs.
Ready to Build Your Own Freedom Portfolio™?
The ideas in this post come directly from Built for Freedom™ — a proven, real-world roadmap to durable wealth, real assets, and tax-smart passive income.
👉 Get your copy of Built for Freedom™ today and start designing a portfolio that pays you for life.
Stay connected with news and updates!
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
We hate SPAM. We will never sell your information, for any reason.